[olug] Nagios or ?
Kevin
sharpestmarble at gmail.com
Fri Aug 5 16:09:28 UTC 2011
When I downloaded Nagios source a few years ago, it included some good
templates that we used in a copy-paste-change fashion. However, while
it included dependencies, a network switch failure gave you one
notification instead of many, when you went to the status board, it
would tell you that many things are down.
It can monitor windows, but I don't remember if it monitored the event
log or what. I do know that we were using it for process
presence/alert if absent.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:31, Barry Von Ahsen <barry at vonahsen.com> wrote:
> service dependencies are nice for that - I've got web content checks, but
> those depend on http, and those depend on connectivity for that server, so
> if the server goes down, I get one notification instead of three
>
> -barry
>
>
> On 8/5/2011 9:07 AM, Bill Brush wrote:
>>
>> I can't guarantee all your design points, but we've been using Nagios here
>> for about 6 years and it's been fairly reliable. A network switch failure
>> shows up as "everything is down" which can overwhelm your phone message
>> queue in a hurry.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Hurley, Rod<RHurley at tenaska.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, so we are struggling to find a mgmt/monitoring product that does
>>> everything, inexpensively. The pipe dream right? We were considering
>>> foglight because it contains netflow stuff, but then it is not capable of
>>> WMI monitoring yet.
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OLUG mailing list
>> OLUG at olug.org
>> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>
More information about the OLUG
mailing list