[olug] OT: wow

[Abraham]

T-mobile doesn't have very good coverage in Omaha. If you're going to get a
Nexus One I wouldn't go with T-mobile.

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:14 PM, DYNATRON tech <dynatron at gmail.com> wrote:

> yeah?...right on! hopefully i have the same luck with verizon if the
> persist
> with these fictitious roaming charges. i recorded all of my verbal
> interactions with these jerk-offs, so i suppose i have a fighting chance if
> they come after me for it. thanks for the bit of positive inspiration.
>
> yeah, i agree. they all treat customers like cattle, no matter who you go
> with.
>
> i would have to disagree with the "throw-away" statement, because i am one
> of the many people that believe in the value of not being in debt to a
> dishonest company. that is priceless in my frame of mind, even if i
> *am*subsidising your phone. ;-)
>
> i like the way T-mobile operates, and i've been impressed by the nexus
> phone, so that may be a positive avenue for me to investigate.
>
> thanks for the feedback, TJ.
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:53 PM, T. J. Brumfield <enderandrew at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > If they breach the contract, or alter the terms of the contract, you get
> > out
> > of it for free.
> >
> > I know two individuals that got out of contracts without paying
> termination
> > fees. Not to mention most companies have largely the same terms. The
> > industry is what it is, and you're not going to get vastly different
> > treatment from AT&T as you'll get from Verizon, Sprint, etc.
> >
> > And you can have a no-contract service, but then you're basically
> throwing
> > money away. You're paying the same money as I am to subsidize a phone,
> but
> > not getting the benefit.
> >
> > T-Mobile is the exception. If you purchase the Nexus One at full price,
> > then
> > you can sign up for a cheaper plan since you're not subsidizing the
> phone,
> > and there is no contract. If I'm paying tons of money per month either
> way,
> > I might as well benefit financially by getting a nicer phone with
> > additional
> > functionality.
> >
> > -- T. J.
> >
> > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:46 PM, DYNATRON tech <dynatron at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > many phone companies offer no-contract services, but like i said
> before,
> > > all
> > > cellular companies seem to act in a dishonest manner in my experience,
> so
> > > seems to be a losing situation no matter how you go about it.
> > >
> > > if you can avoid being in debt to the company (which is what the
> contract
> > > is), then yes, i think it is worth it to a point, even if you don't get
> > the
> > > shiny new phone.
> > >
> > > say you come across a disagreement with the company under contract, you
> > are
> > > obligated to continue giving money to a company involved in perceived
> > > dishonest actions.
> > >
> > > if that doesn't make sense to you, i must be speaking spanish.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Craig Wolf <CJWolf at mpsomaha.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > That brings them in line with Verizon ETF so this is nothing new that
> I
> > > > see...
> > > >
> > > > Craig Wolf
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >>> Rob Townley <rob.townley at gmail.com> 5/23/2010 >>>
> > > > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Charles Bird <
> cbird.omaha at gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > ATT is on its deathbed. no joke, i dont know what to think of that.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Recently, Omaha's Public Record had at least 2 entries for AT&T
> trying
> > > > to put more and taller towers up in Omaha.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Chad Homan <choman at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.betanews.com/article/ATT-to-raise-twoyear-termination-fee-by-86-on-iPhones-smartphones/1274479769
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chad, CISSP
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > OLUG mailing list
> > > > > > OLUG at olug.org
> > > > > > https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
> > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > OLUG mailing list
> > > > > OLUG at olug.org
> > > > > https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > OLUG mailing list
> > > > OLUG at olug.org
> > > > https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > OLUG mailing list
> > > > OLUG at olug.org
> > > > https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > dynatron digital services
> > > box 191 - 68037
> > > www.dynatron.org
> > > dynatron at gmail.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OLUG mailing list
> > > OLUG at olug.org
> > > https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OLUG mailing list
> > OLUG at olug.org
> > https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
> >
>
>
>
> --
> dynatron digital services
> box 191 - 68037
> www.dynatron.org
> dynatron at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>



-- 
Thanks!
Abraham Serafino
email: abrahams at teknohazard.com
homepage: http://www.teknohazard.com/blog

"Linux - It is now safe to turn on your computer."

-- From a Slashdot.org post