[olug] Chrome
Will Langford
unfies at gmail.com
Wed Sep 3 19:26:13 UTC 2008
Innovation is a difficult argument.
Mouse gestures, middle click scrolling, etc are harolded by some as must
haves, I personally don't care :) ... and don't use any of them. I know
many people who hate a lot of the new features in FF3 and kill them on the
spot. KDE4 fork anyone ?
JS speed improvements might be code innovation and make more possible on the
end user side -- as such it might be innovation ?
Process isolation is very narly. While not very useful for the every day
user, I've already found it useful. I'm unsure if possible memory thrashing
is good/bad/untested. Tab re-arrangement is handy.
Tab-dragging-between-windows-etc has also been quite handy. Minimalistic
interface is a good thing IMHO... but I prefer most of my apps to be
minimalistic unless it's development related. The entire menu bar being
hidden within the 'page' icon next to the address bar is a good thing IMHO.
I don't hit the menu bar often in browsers. Kiosk-mode-esque stuff is
handy.
Privacy concerns are noteworthy.
I think the last really useful 'innovation' in a solitary browser release
(rather than standards upgrades) would have to be the Opera 3/4/5 era. Lots
of auto-form-fill-in-stuff, tabby goodness, etc etc etc.
If the Chrome layout is so that
gears/modules/extensions/controls/pick-your-symbolic-name can be added in...
with minimal impact on resources, then that might be a good way to describe
innovative without anything being immediately apparent. KDE4 fork anyone ?
:)
-Will
PS. Sorry for repeated KDE fork jab. I just find all the fork'ers silly :).
More information about the OLUG
mailing list