[olug] Re: A non network network?

[Trent Melcher]

Its Negotiation,   most cards today that are 10/100/1000 play pretty well
(auto-negotiate) with each other going point-to-point....just make sure you
have a crossover cable between them.  

Trent

-----Original Message-----
From: olug-bounces at olug.org [mailto:olug-bounces at olug.org] On Behalf Of Jake
Churchill
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 7:04 AM
To: 'Omaha Linux User Group'
Subject: RE: [olug] Re: A non network network?

I think the term is duplexing.  

-----Original Message-----
From: olug-bounces at olug.org [mailto:olug-bounces at olug.org] On Behalf Of Rob
Townley
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 5:36 AM
To: Omaha Linux User Group
Subject: [olug] Re: A non network network?

Actually, you may not need a crossover ethernet card if you make sure
purchase nics that support autodetection of the signal path (not quite sure
of the terminology used).  A regular Cat5 patch cable and NICs that support
it is all you may need.

On 10/18/05, Craig Wolf <cjwolf at mpsomaha.org> wrote:
> I will have to agree with the first suggestion: if they are close, a 
> wired nic in each with a private subnet.  You can get a Realtek based 
> NIC for about $8 and a crossover cable can be bought (If you are not 
> good at making them) for $10-20 so total H/W cost $36 max plus an hour 
> or less of your time.
>
> Craig Wolf
> Linux Web Server Support
> Desktop/Network Specialist
> 402-894-6283
>
> >>> "Daniel Linder" <dan at linder.org> 10/18/05 11:26 AM >>>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On Tue, October 18, 2005 10:42, Phil Brutsche wrote:
>
> > Hurley Rod wrote:
>
> >> What about the old null modem trick?  Haven't done it for years,
> but
>
> >> I suppose in this case it would work.
>
> >
>
> > Well, as long as you don't mind being limited to 115 kilobit, sure
> ;)
>
>
>
> If we're going down this path, you could look at using the printer 
> port, but I haven't used them under either Linux nor Windows...  Could 
> be faster but probably a lot more work to setup and not as easy to 
> support in the long run.
>
>
>
> A more modern option that might be an option would be to us a USB "pc 
> to pc" network cable.  I haven't used these either, but the speeds 
> should be higher than old serial.
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> - - - - -
>
> "Wait for that wisest of all counselors, time." -- Pericles
>
> "I do not fear computer, I fear the lack of them." -- Isaac Asimov
>
> GPG fingerprint:6FFD DB94 7B96 0FD8 EADF  2EE0 B2B0 CC47 4FDE 9B68
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFDVSIhsrDMR0/em2gRApj8AJ4vOZh9VCgM/9c8dAX5E9U9L9s2wgCeO/tV
> 3WWtpYKXyRGqKQczNNVakaQ=
> =yQtb
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>
_______________________________________________
OLUG mailing list
OLUG at olug.org
http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug


_______________________________________________
OLUG mailing list
OLUG at olug.org
http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug