[olug] Local internet access.

[Sam Tetherow]

Not sure what you mean by shotgunning but there shouldn't be a problem 
doing a dual routed setup.  Now if you are looking for bonded you will 
obviously be needing cooperation from the other end.

Charles Bird wrote:

>Oh man, I have to put in my estatic feeling of the week...I found some apts. right across the street from the qwest CO in Counciltucky I mean like 200-400ft, I dont know where in the line it is but it cant be too far.....whoo!! I asked the lord of the land if I could install 2 phone lines for twin DSL bussiness connections and I got the OK, I'll be moving in 4-5 months. Then I can make my twin rack with a bunk bed on top. =D
>   I'm still wondering about shotgun DSL, I know its been done with and without permision from CO on the east coast and I'm gonna have to talk to those fools to see whats going on with that in our area.
>Anyone know the deal with shotgun dsl? 
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Phil Brutsche <phil at brutsche.us>
>Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 02:14:04 -0500
>To: Omaha Linux User Group <olug at olug.org>
>Subject: Re: [olug] Local internet access.
>
>  
>
>>Eric Lusk wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>The key to qwest is NOT letting their "technicians" install your
>>>internet access
>>>      
>>>
>>Abso-friggin-lutely.  The same can also be said for almost any ISP.
>>
>>At work one of my co-workers has QWeset DSL.  Works great, with one
>>small detail... QWest configured her Cisco 678 DSL modem to be a NATing
>>firewall (she gets 10.0.0.0/24 on her PC).
>>
>>Not a major problem for most home users, but if you're trying to get a
>>IPsec VPN setup working (or even something simple like ssh) it makes for
>>unnecessary complications.
>>
>>-- 
>>
>>Phil Brutsche
>>phil at brutsche.us
>>_______________________________________________
>>OLUG mailing list
>>OLUG at olug.org
>>http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>>    
>>
>
>  
>