[olug] Cox High Speed Internet

[Gregory Thomas]

Who remembers when 9.6k was enough?

Now, we have a entire generation moaning "why cant i have it now"

Ben Dinger wrote:

>On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 05:18:17PM -0700, Eric Lusk wrote:
>  
>
>>My only problem with Cox is when I had them before
>>they blocked port 80 :(  I run a web server, so ended
>>up with Qwest's new 1500 down/1024 up package.
>>I guess you CAN get the port 80 block taken off, but
>>from what I heard it's somewhat spendy, have to call
>>it a "business" account.
>>    
>>
>
>That new Qwest package is by far THE SHIT.  I saved my company several hundred dolares a month by going to the 1.5/1 (or 896) package in our Fremont offsite instead of our old 768/768 circuit.  According to Qwest (when we signed up), to get the port blockage off all you need is a static IP block.  No biggie there. 
>
>Oh, and, it became a conveinent place for me to put my web/email server due to extermely low utilization of the connection there, and well - ALLTEL'S DSL TIERS SUCK THE BALLS AND ASS. Oh, did I say that? :) 
>
>Anyway, I really, really, wish that we could get the speed options in Lincoln that you omaha folk are blessed with.  The best economy-wise we can do is TWC's 3MB/384k Cable.  Alltel's "best" upload offering is the 512k/512k DSL "ultra".  They should be shot. 
>
>Ahem.. anyway, heh.. lucky bastards ;). 
>
>  
>