[olug] BAMP vs LAMP

[Mike Peterson]

I am currently use LAMP and am considering using BAMP.
I have only been keeping up on FreeBSD as an alternate.
I get the CD subscription each time one is released as a subscriber.
I have been playing with FreeBSD some since 1998.
I have not used MySQL or PHP with it yet though.
The FreeBSD 5.0 and 5.1 were sent out but they do not work properly.
FreeBSD 4.8 is the latest stable release that I was sent.
I use Red Hat for LAMP at present.
Due to Red Hat no longer selling a consumer release and other Linux issues,
I am looking toward FreeBSD to replace LAMP.
I was just wanting to see what type of results users of FreeBSD or OpenBSD
are having with setting up and running Apache, MySQL, and PHP with them
versus Linux as the OS.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "OBrien, Timothy (Omaha Linux Users Group - OLUG)"
<IrishMASMS at olug.org>
To: <olug at olug.org>
Cc: <mpeterson at mail.charlesfurniture.com>
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: [olug] BAMP vs LAMP


> <quote who="Mike Peterson">
> > Does anyone on the list use a BSD release instead of Linux and run
> > Apache, MySQL, and PHP? If so, is it FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, or BSD
> > Commercial?
> > _______________________________________________
> > OLUG mailing list
> > OLUG at olug.org
> > http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>
> Yes they do, and I will let them speak on their behalf. I believe they are
> using FreeBSD or NetBSD.
>
> Why do you ask?
>
> -- 
> Timothy "Irish" O'Brien
> Publicity & Social activities chairperson
> Omaha Linux User's Group (OLUG)
> ----------------------------------------------
> A: No.
> Q: Should I include e-mail quotations after my reply?
> =====================================================
> An often repeated quote on news.admin.net-abuse.email:
> <I>
> "Spam is not about content, it is about consent".
> </i>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug