[olug] List Archives ???

[OBrien, Timothy (Omaha Linux Users Group - OLUG)]

<quote who="Christopher Cashell">
[snipped]
> Considering that the e-mail addresses are mangled, I think we should
> keep the archive publically available.  (Especially since it sounds like
> there's a couple of unofficial archives that are already publically
> available, making it pointless to try to hide things now.)
[sniped]

AFAIK, the unofficial archive I know of is not complete (although the
official archive is not complete either). The unofficial archive was also
set up as a test project, and is set to munge the email addys. Please
correct me if I am wrong, oh owner of the unofficial archive who lurks on
the list. ;)

A few months back, when it was mentioned on the list that the archive was
unsecured the list admin locked it down as it is today. See his reasons in
a previous post today as to why he took those actions, rather than what
you are suggesting again. (Yes, what you are suggesting was suggested when
the issue was brought up.)

Bottom line, the issue resides with the OLUG Sys Admin & owner of the
systems. Sorry I am unable to give you a better answer.

--
Timothy "Irish" O'Brien
Publicity & Social activities chairperson
Omaha Linux User's Group (OLUG)
----------------------------------------------
A: No.
Q: Should I include e-mail quotations after my reply?
=====================================================
An often repeated quote on news.admin.net-abuse.email:
<I>
"Spam is not about content, it is about consent".
</i>