[olug] old news - but worth noting

[Mike Peterson]

Have you looked at www.pandasoftware.com?
They make AntiVirus software for Linux (Many distros) and support Sendmail,
Postfix, and Qmail as per their site.

This link is for a product to scan the perimeter and works with Sendmail.
http://shop.pandasoftware.com/product.asp?catalog%5Fname=0_Products&category_name=C&product%5Fid=C81-25-1&Action+Key=licenseshop&calc=yes&product_qty=6&dur=4&modo=BOX

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Trent Melcher" <tmelcher at trilogytel.com>
To: "Omaha Linux User Group" <olug at olug.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [olug] old news - but worth noting


> I just wish the folks at RAV would have looked past the money and
> realized what is going to happen to a fine product when M$ gets their
> hands on it.
>
> Look what happened to Visio, I used it prior to M$ buying it.  Once they
> did IMO the product went downhill and I stopped using/buying it.
>
> Trent
>
>
> On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 09:55, Jay Hannah wrote:
> > Trent Melcher wrote:
> > > I wish I was looking for just AV software, then my search would be
> > > easier.  What is nice about RAV is that it a corporation grade
> > > SPAM/Antivirus/Content filter.  Im able to scan all email coming in
and
> > > going out of all 17 of our domains.
> >
> > Yup. Must be good stuff or M$ wouldn't have bothered buying it to kill
> > it, eh? We're not happy either. Gotta love 'em. Wherefore art though,
> > justice department?
> >
> > > I only run sendmail on Linux, so Im limited as to what to use.
> >
> > You've got a typo there. I think that sentence, spelled correctly, is:
> > "Obviously, of all possible mail server configurations I only run
> > sendmail on Linux because it's fast, stable, free, extremely scalable,
> > and maintenance free. Groupware (no matter how fancy) is certainly not
> > worth a 100X hit on costs, hardware requirements, scalability, and
> > stability. It's unfortunate that there doesn't seem to be a lot of other
> > companies like RAV on the market. If there were, M$ would have had to
> > make a few *more* people rich to hold it's monopoly, killing all
> > competition in infancy. Even though buying out 5 competitors would have
> > been only a few more drops out of the bottomless M$ money bucket, they
> > would have at least scratched the juggernaut a little more on their way
> > off the market."
> >
> > Not that I'm bitter about RAV or anything.
> >
> > Sigh,
> >
> > j
> > _______________________________________________
> > OLUG mailing list
> > OLUG at olug.org
> > http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
> -- 
> Trent Melcher <tmelcher at trilogytel.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug