[olug] Server OS after Dec 31, 2003

[Vincent.Raffensberger at dtn.com]

I submitted the article on Monday.  I don't it has been posted yet though.


It can be found here:
http://members.cox.net/drizzt/RHL_to_Fedora.htm



"OBrien, Timothy  (Omaha Linux Users Group - OLUG)" <IrishMASMS at olug.org> 
Sent by: olug-bounces at olug.org
12/08/2003 07:54 PM
Please respond to
IrishMASMS at olug.org; Please respond to
Omaha Linux User Group <olug at olug.org>


To
<olug at olug.org>
cc

Subject
Re: [olug] Server OS after Dec 31, 2003








> The part which says "proving ground for new technology that may
> eventually  make its way into Red Hat products (read: Enterprise)"?
> This was true for RedHat Linux too.  Only the most stable and mature
> technologies make it into RHEL.
> For example, the CUPS printing package was introduced in RHL 7.1?, but
> didn't make it to RHEL until the latest 3.0 release.
>
> Unless you need formal/ commercial support, the differences between RHL
> and FLC are primarily in the name.
>
> I started writing up a little article on it.  I just need to polish it
> and  add references before I post it.
> Hopefully it will be done tonight.
>

Please feel free to submit it in the Review sections on OLUG.org:
http://www.olug.org/modules.php?name=Reviews&rop=write_review

-- 
Timothy "Irish" O'Brien
Publicity & Social activities chairperson
Omaha Linux User's Group (OLUG)
----------------------------------------------
A: No.
Q: Should I include e-mail quotations after my reply?
=====================================================
An often repeated quote on news.admin.net-abuse.email:
<I>
"Spam is not about content, it is about consent".
</i>


_______________________________________________
OLUG mailing list
OLUG at olug.org
http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug