[olug] The Joys of WindoMaker
Mike Hostetler
thehaas at binary.net
Mon Sep 9 12:18:25 UTC 2002
I just tried iceWM over the weekend. After a few hours working with it,
I have to say -- wow. It's really, really cool -- configurable and
fast. I'm not a big fan of the Start-button type-interface, so I am
making buttons. It's great that I can just do that.
Mike
On Sat, 2002-09-07 at 03:33, Eric Pierce wrote:
> I used WindowMaker for my 'introductory' year into
> Linux. It's fantastic and the newer versions (=>0.80)
> never crashed once on me.
>
> Just out of curiousity though I tried out IceWM a few
> months back, and I must say I like it a bit better
> than WMaker for my 333Mhz laptop.
> Here's a few cool things.
> 1. Smaller memory footprint (about 2~3 MB smaller
> than Wmaker)
> 2. Anti-aliased text support in menus/title bars/etc.
> 3. Starts up noticably quicker than WMaker (again
> 333Mhz, etc.)
> 4. Arguably better theme support - Here's a goodie
> (http://themes.freshmeat.net/screenshots/27711/)
> 5. Keybinding support is at least as good as WMakers
> (hate that mouse)
> 6. Do you use '<crtl><alt>L/R arrows' to switch
> workspaces? You don't? Er... anyway you can
> '<crtl><alt><shift>L/R arrows' to easily move apps to
> different workspaces. Does WMaker have this
> keybinding?
> 7. The 'IceDock' program lets you run WMapps under
> IceWM
> 8. Has never crashed on me
>
> I'm not trying to start a window manager flame war
> either. I'm just as happy as the next camper that
> there's such a fantastic variety of high quality
> window managers available under Linux... especially in
> regards to lower spec machines.
>
> My 2 bits,
> Eric
>
> --- Mike Hostetler <thehaas at binary.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 10:01:02PM -0500, Quinn
> > Coldiron wrote:
> > > Not to start a desktop war, but actually, my
> > favorite is Windowmaker,
> > > then XFCE is a close second. Something about
> > Windowmaker just keeps me
> > > coming back. It's clean, fast and elegant. I
> > installed Ximian to get
> > > the sweet icons and pixmaps. A bit of a pig just
> > for icons I guess :-)
> >
> > I just recently went back to WindowMaker after about
> > a year in Ximian/GNOME
> > world. It's a great setup (for me, at least) and is
> > not a hog in memory
> > like GNOME is. Just I still have GNOME libs
> > installed to run Evolution and a
> > few other GNOME apps that I like.
> >
> > But, since I last used WindowMaker, they seemed to
> > have taken away the
> > WMPrefs app. What is now the "official" WM
> > configuration program
> > (besides "vi on the config files =)?
> >
> > > Now that I have the /usr/share/pixmaps directory
> > and subs burned to a
> > > CDROM I don't need it anymore...
> >
> > That's a really, really good idea . . . .
> >
> > -- mikeh
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OLUG mailing list
> > OLUG at olug.org
> > http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
> http://finance.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> http://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>
--
Mike Hostetler
thehaas at binary.net
http://www.binary.net/thehaas
GnuPG key: http://www.binary.net/thehaas/mikeh.gpg
"What good is having someone who can walk on water if you don't follow
in his footsteps?"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.olug.org/pipermail/olug/attachments/20020909/178d23c5/attachment.pgp>
More information about the OLUG
mailing list