[olug] OT: After installfest

Tue Jul 16 01:38:34 UTC 2002

No, seriously, if she is true to what she claims, I
feel sorry for her kid.  

-Chris 

--- Eric Penne <epenne at yahoo.com> wrote:
> You're just saying it's sad because you didn't drink
> the kamikazee. :)
> 
> Eric
> 
> --- CM Miller <cmmiller1973 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Words of advise to the young people on the list...
> > 
> > Although it is nice to get out from behind the
> > keyboard/monitor once in awhile, do social
> activities,
> > and I've been in alot of watering holes in this
> > country and two others, that was perhaps the
> weirdest,
> > strangest, saddest thing that I've seen in a long
> > time.  
> > 
> > I did enjoy the Installfest though and perhaps we
> can
> > have some social outings after the
> > meetings/installfest. 
> > 
> > -Chris 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- Nate Rotschafer <writetogenius at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > I simply find it necessary to mention the
> "younger"
> > > olug members...
> > > 
> > > Nate
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >From: Eric Penne <epenne at yahoo.com>
> > > >Reply-To: olug at olug.org
> > > >To: olug at olug.org
> > > >Subject: Re: [olug] OT: After installfest
> > > >Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
> > > >
> > > >There are some women on the list. 
> > > http://www.linuxchix.net is hosted
> > > >right here in Nebraska, IIRC.  Lets not get
> into
> > > the stereotypical
> > > >male/female flame war here.
> > > >
> > > >I was trying to get "the one who was chosen
> before
> > > me" to speak, but he
> > > >is smart enough not to get involved.
> > > >
> > > >Everybody remember next time that some of us
> want
> > > to get together
> > > >afterwards so don't go running off so fast. 
> Food,
> > > drinks, and fun.
> > > >
> > > >I also think we should have an installfest more
> > > often.  We should also
> > > >go to the bars after each meeting.
> > > >
> > > >Eric
> > > >
> > > >--- Jonathan Warren <jonwarren at cox.net> wrote:
> > > > > Are they active women in the olug group?  I
> know
> > > there is a
> > > > > women.kde.org which I might find very biased
> and
> > > discriminating.
> > > > > Except that as a white male I can not be
> > > discriminated against.  At
> > > > > least that is what the newspaper said.  How
> many
> > > olug followers are
> > > > > female?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 02:06:56PM -0500,
> Tanya
> > > Loughead wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A short lesson in Logic (brought to you by
> > > some chick):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 'A fallacy of Weak Inference: "Post
> Hoc..." or
> > > "Hasty
> > > > > Generalization":
> > > > > > This fallacy occurs when one offers a
> > > generalization based on too
> > > > > few
> > > > > > examples or on examples that mislead about
> > > some larger population.
> > > > > This
> > > > > > is a weak inference-- however, even strong
> > > generalizations can
> > > > > easily be
> > > > > > falsified by a counter example'
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A-hem.  Shame on you.
> > > > > > A computer minded person must first and
> > > foremost be a logical
> > > > > person.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 14:03, David Walker
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > If that were true then all men should be
> in
> > > touch with their
> > > > > feminine sides.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Perhaps she wasn't after a man at all
> but
> > > rather was interested
> > > > > in some
> > > > > > > conversation and attention without being
> hit
> > > on.  Personally I
> > > > > can talk all
> > > > > > > day to a married woman or one I'm not
> > > particularly attracted to
> > > > > but get me in
> > > > > > > front of a single attractive woman and
> my
> > > brain cuts out (most of
> > > > > the time
> > > > > > > anyways).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Monday 15 July 2002 02:01 pm,
> Jonathan
> > > Warren wrote:
> > > > > > > > All I know about women is that if you
> take
> > > a man and remove all
> > > > > logic an
> > > > > > > > reason you have a women.  :)  OK that
> was
> > > a little abrasive but
> > > > > I thought
> > > > > > > > it would be fun to say.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:39:23PM
> -0500,
> > > Tanya Loughead wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Tsk, Tsk tsk... (that's me shaking
> my
> > > head in feminist
> > > > > disapproval) ;-)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I am surprised that bright,
> scientific
> > > minded guys such as
> > > > > yourselves
> > > > > > > > > would make broad sweeping
> > > generalizations about women based
> > > > > on one or
> > > > > > > > > two empirical studies.
> > > > > > > > > Perhaps next time you boy-geeks go
> to
> > > the Crescent Moon for a
> > > > > few beers,
> > > > > > > > > you'll need a girl-geek to go along
> with
> > > you to set you on
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > right-minded path. heh heh
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 13:11, Daniel
> > > Pfile wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 12:45, Carl
> > > Lundstedt wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 13:21, CM
> > > Miller wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > The things that strikes me
> funny
> > > is she was after all
> > > > > > > > > > > > the married men at the table,
> not
> > > the single guys...
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Jeez, what part of 'hey,
> there's a
> > > wedding ring on my
> > > > > > > > > > > > left hand' do you not
> understand?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > -Chris
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > What part of 'women usually find
> > > that really attractive'
> > > > > don't you
> > > > > > > > > > > understand.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > (I get WAY more attention now
> that I
> > > have the 'ring' than
> 
=== message truncated ===

=====
*****************************************
GAIM ID:  cmmiller1973
*****************************************

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

For help contact olug-help at olug.org - run by ezmlm
to unsubscribe, send mail to olug-unsubscribe at olug.org
or `mail olug-unsubscribe at olug.org < /dev/null`
(c)1998-2002 OLUG http://www.olug.org

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_