[olug] Chrome

Sam Tetherow tetherow at shwisp.net
Fri Sep 5 17:38:48 UTC 2008


Will Langford wrote:
>> Eventually we'll all be working for cloud providers/SAAS providers, or we
>> won't be working with linux.
>>     
>
>
> I honestly don't think so.
>
> While access to your data from any location and any device is... luring... I
> doubt we'll be heading back to the days of the dumb terminal and mainframe
> approach.  There's many reasons why... paranoia,
> not-wanting-everything-networked (see NAT toaster thread a while back),
> speed, etc.  Even with a smarter local terminal, I still just don't see it
> happening.
>
> As it is, I'm starting to see folly in having many of my important things in
> a web-only based environment.  There was a slashdot thread a while back
> about how to backup data you have on google... dunno if the thread produced
> any results.  Can probably IMAP mirror gmail, but what about the other apps
> ?  And paranoia/security is always a fun issue.
>
> Chrome, or any browser in a KIOSK mode makes perfect sense for google.  I've
> made similar comments to others as well for some time (nothing on list,
> tho).
>
> A similarly fun thing to note would be many ISP's instituting bandwidth
> caps/budgets.  At what point do those interfere with cloud computing ?
>   
It depends on the cap really.  Comcast has talked about setting the 
limit at something like 250G/month which currently is probably on the 
high side.  The only users this would affect are the P2P users and those 
that do a large amount of online video.  Anyone else who is pushing 250G 
around per month is more than likely going to have a business class 
account or dedicated bandwidth.

    Sam Tetherow
    Sandhills Wireless

> -Will
> _______________________________________________
> OLUG mailing list
> OLUG at olug.org
> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug
>   




More information about the OLUG mailing list