[olug] Re: @home

Mike Peterson mpeterson at charles.coxatwork.com
Fri Aug 24 16:38:23 UTC 2001


What did you replace it with?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Bettis" <jeremyb at hksys.com>
To: <olug at bstc.net>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 7:17 AM
Subject: [olug] Re: @home


> Even @work doesn't allow servers at the standard level.  For servers you
> have to have the subnet plan, which has install fee of $1000 and monthly
> fees of ~$350.  (We just canceled our account here, so these are not
> hypothetical)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Pfile" <pfiled at marietta.edu>
> To: <olug at bstc.net>
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:01 PM
> Subject: RE: @home
>
>
> > --On Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:52 PM -0500 "Smith, Daniel E."
> > <DESmith at West.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The only thing that every one is forgetting is that in the @home
> contract
> > > is says that you are forbidden to run a server on your cable modem
> > > connection. So If you are, they do have the right by the contract to
> take
> > > away your service. I know it sucks but that is why they have the more
> > > expensive @work, and you can always get dsl. If you buy static ip's
> > > (about $120 a month) you can do what ever you want.
> >
> > I'm aware of that, but that's a business service. I'm not a business,
I'll
> > never move data like a business. Personally I have a choice of 3
different
> > high speed locations to stick any data I want on. I think if you're
going
> > to move alot of data you should be paying extra, or paying for
> > colocation/vhosting, whatever.
> >
> > At home I'm a user and a hobbiest, @work is out of my price range. Like
I
> > said, why not just charge $5 more a month for the privilage of having
> > inbound ports? You're still restricted to what trafic you can move,
you've
> > just got a slightly higher level of service... @home Pro if you will.
> @work
> > is still for real business users. If we're modifying the aup they can
nix
> > that not running servers thing or change it to something more
reasonable.
> > Technicly alot of stuff is a server, some games even. I'd like to see
them
> > ban a user for playing a game, since they _could_.
> >
> > -- Daniel
> >
> >
>
>
> -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
>
> For help contact olug-help at bstc.net - run by ezmlm
> to unsubscribe, send mail to olug-unsubscribe at bstc.net
> or `mail olug-unsubscribe at bstc.net < /dev/null`
> (c)2001 OLUG http://www.olug.org
>
> -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
>
>


-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

For help contact olug-help at bstc.net - run by ezmlm
to unsubscribe, send mail to olug-unsubscribe at bstc.net
or `mail olug-unsubscribe at bstc.net < /dev/null`
(c)2001 OLUG http://www.olug.org

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_




More information about the OLUG mailing list