I think Jay from RTU might have some Cisco 4000 series stuff laying around<br><br><br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Phil Brutsche <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:phil@brutsche.us">phil@brutsche.us</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">IOS vs CatOS makes no difference to me. If it made a difference to me I<br>
would not have mentioned it.<br>
<br>
BTW You don't need a SupII+ to run IOS, a Supervisor III will do just<br>
fine. I have several Catalyst 4006 chassis, Supervisor IIIs and 10/100<br>
line cards. No GBIC line cards though.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
Dan Clough wrote:<br>
> Sounds good.<br>
><br>
> Although, if you prefer working with IOS, we could replace that 4912G<br>
> with a Catalyst 4000. �As you definitely know, the 4000s/4500s with<br>
> the SupII+ modules and up all run IOS. �If we can snag a 4000 with IOS<br>
> and get the GBIC modules we would have a nice L3-capable distribution<br>
> setup.<br>
><br>
> If space allows we'll most likely stick the router and distribution<br>
> switches in a two-post to save precious rackspace. �This will allow us<br>
> to move up to the bigger, more expandable setups like the 4000s and<br>
> make the networking kit more accessible.<br>
<br>
</div>--<br>
<div class="im"><br>
Phil Brutsche<br>
<a href="mailto:phil@brutsche.us">phil@brutsche.us</a><br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
olug-colo mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:olug-colo@olug.org">olug-colo@olug.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug-colo" target="_blank">https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug-colo</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>