<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Luke-Jr <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:luke@dashjr.org">luke@dashjr.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Saturday 04 April 2009 08:28:44 pm Aric wrote:<br>
> I isn't dead but IMO it is better to host your own project unless it is<br>
> intended for mass consumption and you can't figure out how to capitalize on<br>
> the traffic yourself.<br>
<br>
</div>SourceForge's website quite frankly sucks compared what it was 10 years ago.<br>
Launchpad works fine for modern projects.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> I would think the only benefit would be to have subversion as this is not a<br>
> typical feature of cheap shared host.<br>
<br>
</div>Uh... if we're setting up a colo, I don't think we need to be worrying about<br>
cheap shared hosts not providing Subversion? :p<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
olug-colo mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:olug-colo@olug.org">olug-colo@olug.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug-colo" target="_blank">https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug-colo</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>Yes, sf has ruined their UI.�� But they are very reliable and offer a ton of features - look at all the hosted apps options.� Dead?� SF actually has money in the bank and a decent price to earnings ratio (last fal, but maybe they were hit by Madoff since).� i would not be surprised if they are more� profitable than many glamorous names.� SF recently posted another job posting for sysadmins to work from home.<br>