[olug-colo] The Legal Mumbo-Jumbo

Dan Clough dclough at gmail.com
Sun Apr 5 17:04:12 EDT 2009


Wednesdays at 5:30 work well for me, lunch meetings are a no-go due to distance.

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Brian Roberson <roberson at bstc.net> wrote:
> I think that is a good idea, We should be focussed on a few other topics for
> now, just shooting from the hip:
> Logistics:
>   - Renting a suite?
>   - Renting a cage?
>   - Renting an office?
> Speed and Feeds:
>   - Pinpoint? Cox? Others?
>   - initial pipe size - 5Mb? 10Mb?
>   - Preferably ethernet handoff?
> Billing:
>  - Need a baseline of costs for initial door opening
>  - Space cost (Cage or suite or building)
>  - Connectivity costs ( initial internet access )
> Infrastructure:
>  - Between Phil & I, we can cover the initial investments of all routing and
> switching hardware. (we will stick with Cisco gear for this)
>  - IDS/IPS : IDS will be placed on furthest egress point, IDS only, using
> snort/acid
>  - QOS should be done on a per Ethernet port basis to ensure outbound
> traffic is limited(mls qos shaping)
>  - per-port traffic metrics will be stored in either RRD's or raw SQL using
> netflow collectors (plenty of FOSS tools for this, such
> as http://nfsen.sourceforge.net)
>  - Build front/backend tools to manage shared services and membership
> management:
>       -  shared DNS
>       -  VPS/XEN allocation/creation
>       -  webhosting
>       -  billing tools
>       - reporting interfaces (traffic, services, etc.)
> That is a way short list, but I think everyone see's the scale here :-) I
> think we should probably break-up into working groups, and start a weekly
> "all-hands" meeting to discuss progress. Wednesdays either a lunch meeting
> or after 5:30 works for me. I can find space with a white board and internet
> access for sure
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Dan Clough <dclough at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The worry was regarding someone else not being stationary.  With the
>> housing market the way it is, I'll be here for a long, long, long
>> time.
>>
>> Regarding the zoning laws, that's true and an oversight on my part.
>> Here are the potential solutions:
>>
>> 1) List our registered office as the actual datacenter (with the
>> permission of Pinpoint/STC)
>> 2) Use a PO box (Questionable legality)
>> 3) List our RO at the AIM institute (with the permission of the AIM
>> institute)
>>
>>  Shall we hold off on the rest of the legal process until after
>> meeting with AIM's general counsel?
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Luke-Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
>> > On Sunday 05 April 2009 02:48:55 pm Dan Clough wrote:
>> >> I've attached the Articles to this email, feel free to read over them.
>> >>  If everyone approves I'll drop them off at the courthouse sometime
>> >> this week.
>> >
>> > Weren't we going to use some other address for the corp to avoid filing
>> > every
>> > time you move? Or was that someone else that isn't stationary...?
>> >
>> > Also, might want to verify that there won't be zoning problems with
>> > registering an address there.
>> >
>> > Luke
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > olug-colo mailing list
>> > olug-colo at olug.org
>> > https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug-colo
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> olug-colo mailing list
>> olug-colo at olug.org
>> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug-colo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> olug-colo mailing list
> olug-colo at olug.org
> https://lists.olug.org/mailman/listinfo/olug-colo
>
>


More information about the olug-colo mailing list